Tuesday, February 17, 2026
More
    HomeAfricaZimbabwe war veterans challenge Mnangagwa term extension in court

    Zimbabwe war veterans challenge Mnangagwa term extension in court

    -

    HARARE, Feb 17 (Reuters) - Veterans ‌of Zimbabwe's liberation war mounted a court challenge on ​Tuesday to proposed changes to the constitution that would extend presidential terms from five years ⁠to seven, allowing President Emmerson Mnangagwa to stay in office until 2030.

    Mnangagwa, 83, was meant to step down in 2028, after serving two five-year terms. There ​has been a succession battle in the ruling ZANU-PF party over how to replace ‌him.

    The president came to power after a 2017 military coup ousted post-independence leader Robert Mugabe. The latter's 37 years in power were strongly supported by the veterans ⁠who helped him defeat white minority rule before independence from ⁠Britain in 1980.

    The challenge, by six veterans, alleges that the changes, which also include a provision that the president be elected by parliament rather than through a direct popular vote, are unconstitutional.

    "The bill seeks, in both design and ‌effect, to prolong the 1st respondent's incumbency and current term of office," the ⁠court papers read.

    "That constitutional violation is further deepened by ‌the manifest intention not to hold a referendum, ​notwithstanding the constitution's entrenched safeguards against unilateral alteration of the democratic tenure framework".

    Zimbabwe government spokesperson Nick Mangwana said: "The people who have made this court application ‌are only six individuals out of the thousands ​of war veterans in this country."

    Speaking ⁠by telephone, he added that they had a "right to represent ‌themselves and their own personal views".

    Lovemore Madhuku, ⁠the lawyer representing the war veterans, said the cabinet amending the constitution and putting it to a parliamentary vote - where it will face little opposition from ​the ZANU-PF majority that ‌controls both houses - rather than holding a referendum, defied constitutional norms.

    "If the court ⁠agrees, they (the veterans) will seek an order ​that nullifies the bill," he said.

    (Reporting by Chris Takudzwa Muronzi; Editing ​by Tim Cocks and Alex Richardson)

    tagreuters.com2026binary_LYNXMPEM1G0P0-VIEWIMAGE

    Author

    Stay Connected

    1,800FansLike
    259FollowersFollow
    121FollowersFollow
    1,263FollowersFollow
    90,000SubscribersSubscribe

    Related articles

    Latest posts

    Share on Social Media

    spot_img