HomeAdvocacy GroupsHungary rights groups criticise legislation to oust president

Hungary rights groups criticise legislation to oust president

-

BUDAPEST, June 25 (Reuters) - Two ‌Hungarian rights groups have criticised a draft constitutional amendment ​by Prime Minister Peter Magyar's government that proposes the removal of President Tamas Sulyok and ⁠the introduction of a term limit for members of parliament.

Magyar's centre-right Tisza party, which ousted Viktor Orban's nationalist conservative government in April after 16 years, ​argues that Sulyok is a "puppet" of Orban, and that a 12-year term limit on lawmakers ‌would promote broader representation.

Hungary's president has only limited powers to veto legislation or have it reviewed.

Sulyok, who served for 10 years as a Constitutional Court judge, eight ⁠of them as its head, until parliament appointed him president ⁠in 2024, has said he has no political agenda and has merely provided necessary checks and balances.

Tisza's supermajority in parliament enables it to modify the constitution and roll back changes by Orban that critics say have harmed democracy.

The ‌bill says its aim is to ensure "the preconditions for the restoration of constitutional ⁠democracy". The planned constitutional amendment would end Sulyok's term ‌immediately, citing society's "serious loss of confidence" in him.

The ​human rights campaign group Amnesty International Hungary said it believed Sulyok had become "unworthy of his office". 

But its communication director, Aron Demeter, told the channel ATV ‌late on Wednesday that impeachment would be a "better and ​fairer" process than removing the ⁠president with a constitutional amendment, and more in line with ‌international standards.    

Political analyst Gabor Torok also criticised ⁠the plan to remove the head of state "with a one-sentence constitutional amendment".

"Those who vote for this think ... they can do anything with their qualified majority," Torok ​wrote on Facebook.

The Hungarian ‌Civil Liberties Union said setting a term limit for members of parliament was not ⁠an urgent issue, arguing that it should ​be decided within the framework of a thorough constitutional review. 

(Reporting by ​Anita Komuves; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

tagreuters.com2026binary_LYNXMPEM5O0NY-VIEWIMAGE

Author

Stay Connected

2,300FansLike
292FollowersFollow
119FollowersFollow
1,230FollowersFollow
140,985SubscribersSubscribe

Related articles

Latest posts

Share on Social Media

spot_img